patrisaurus wrote:
On the other hand, Incendax, it is also morally equivalent to attacking someone for walking up to you and trying to convince you to betray your nation by disbanding your formation right before an enemy warparty walks into the room. Since there are a lot of shades of potential persuasions and the code cannot distinguish one from another it is accurately classified as aggressive.
Attacking someone for trying to convince you to betray your nation is quite morally reprehensible, even if it is legally treason in many countries. It seems out of the question to consider coding persuasion attempts to recognize the nationality of the persuader. Meanwhile, a blanket limitation of being ignored after a failed persuasion would be significantly easier to code.
Of course, the entire issue is rather low-priority.