Shattered Kingdoms

Oh, no.


You didn't.


Not to her.

I want you to imagine me fleeing from this thread at top speed, kthx.

Unless your griffon was a complete [REDACTED] that doesn't know anything about deep-elves. In which case, you're perfectly within the bounds of "good roleplay."

MR Griffbarbs are not noted for their genius.

No, but a creature "incapable" of evil should recognize that there are creatures "incapable" of goodness. It's not [REDACTED] subjective. It is the REALITY of SK.

You're way off base, Ilky. Tagg uses pemotes all the time.

Something about playing the alignment of your CHARACTER and not his or her ORGANIZATION comes to mind. Didn't a griffon get massively punished for this garbage not long ago?

Halela. Scrup griffon, wanted to be in the Harlies.

She got in, but then she found out that life isn't always like a box of chocolates.

Sometimes life's like a box of memory-erasing beams from Ain. Or was it Marfik? I lose track.

There have been scrupulous Harlequins since. I have put them there.

Griffons are their own problem.

There were scrupulous harlies prior as well. It wasn't alignment that was the issue.

I know what you mean.

Posts I've seen of this Halela tend to be less roleplay and more "epic lulz." No offense to anyone involved, but whatever history of it made it to me seemed to really fail to give the cabal any additional meaningfulness or material. It just seemed like drunken inn roleplay with wingsauce on top ( though I certainly could be missing a lot of important information.) BUT AS FOR SEREMELA, THE SUBJECT OF THIS THREAD...

I liked Seremela because she always, in her hilarity, seemed to have a predictability about her character that made it more believable that she was, in fact, actually as unique as you would think after your first encounter with her. She worked out as an incredibly well-executed concept, and I'm glad you shared her with us.