Shattered Kingdoms

The hellion sounded more of a lightie than the supposed lighties in the Talons.

Amenhoshet is a newb for instantly deleting. The imms who said he should have made amenhoshet a leader is a newb because in game the council told me specifically amenhoshet would never be a leader and that was why sakim and the council agreed they it was safe to let amenhoshet back in, and use him as the tool he was born to be. I personally always liked the idea of having a darky in the talons, a pitbull sakim could send in to do the really dirty parts of the job. that being said there was no room for error on amenhoshets part, and by that I mean, act like a lighty instead of a darky. So it really depends on if what issah said about you wanting to declare war with our allies is true. Your lucky I even gave you a shot though, I had already decided the moment you asked to join that I wouldn't accept you, mainly because I knew that hellions can't be trusted for [REDACTED] because its so easy to warp their code, it was out of pity for the person behind the char that i decided to give him a chance. If you hadn't immedietly deleted you would have been let back in by order of the council, sucks that you didn't have the fortitude to rejoin us though.

That's what the tarnish command is for, Rial.

The voice of moderation.

Jardek.

As per usual, might I add.

Just wait until he is a full-fledged Lawyer, he'll start taking up SK clients and debate their sides FOR them.

I'd just like to mention I did not delete right after it happened, I waited a few weeks and it was a personal choice to delete b/c the char wasn't fun anymore. I had really good rp with Ain over this whole situation. I woudl like to thank the player of greyforth for being the only talon to rp the situation with me. The other people who rped it with me was members of the swan and Ain.

I just thought there was a bunch of ooc drama behind this so I decided to start with a clean slate.

I just wish you were around more after the 'fallout' or maybe our paths just did not cross so much. I just wish it was easier to avoid the OOC influence the game tends to have lately, when the OOC drama / decisions going on take precidence over an individual's desire to play a character whose IC contributions/roleplay have such potential & actual affect on the game itself.

The loss of Issah, Amenhoset, and withdrawl of activity from several other major players involved in shows people need to stop interacting so negatively OOC and play the characters to review/resolve issues. Things done in error (such as an offline cabal removal when a tarnishment could have sufficed) when reported can (and were) reviewed and allowances made.

As much as I IC disagreed with Issah IC on some things, but also could not support a hellion IC (but could support principles) the IC conflict I found invigorating. Much introspectiveness given to my own concept, much interaction with others from it.

I do believe firmly Amenhoset had a future to forge but if the rest of the Talon had (for whatever reason save Greyforth) not been active/participatory, the whole thing was left in a stagnant limbo. . . fizzle. . and poof.

The majority of SK doesn't like conflict, well at least nothing beyond >>> "OMFG YOU DAREZ DISAGREE WITH ME? DIEZ!!!!"

Only because it is easier to QQ than to RP in most cases. It's a shame really. Which seems a far greater problem with the playerbase than the game. At least in how we lose the RPers to this kind of thing Don't know if there is a means to "fix" this simply either.