Shattered Kingdoms

Buh? I explained my position fairly well in my first post. Perhaps you should re-read it?

So using something that is given to you to their fullest potential is abuse in your book, right?

I guess you never enchant your armor either, just wear it with the enchants it comes with, right? After all putting more enchants on it increases its potential and it's not meant to be like that, else there would be armor pieces with 8 MP on them, right?

Seriously now, is that even an argument? Because I fail to see that as the result of an intelligent man's thoughts.

Oh, I agree with you completely, which is why I've said to you a gazillion times, it's not against the rules, and I understand the allure, and I used to do it when I played a tribunal character, etcetera etcetera ad nauseum ad infinitum (I almost think that you must be illiterate to have ignored so many iterations).

However, as I demonstrated with adjectives a few months ago, and as people have demonstrated throughout the years with their non-rule breaking use of legal game functions that have resulted in the changing of rules and the changing of code (for example, voodoo, energy drain, even bash), just because something is within the rules does not mean it is fair or intended.



Pretty sure I answered this lump of sarcasm above. If you need me to dumb it down a little more for you, let me know.

I just fail to see how giving EQ to tribunal NPCs really makes things overpowered. It's far easier for your enemies to retrieve the 1337 EQ from an NPC, so your efforts are usually going to be wasted.

Feel free to demonstrate to us how can you abuse that tactic and create cities of overpowered guards. And I will be there to laugh when your enemies will simply attack the city when you are not online and retrieve all that elite equipment with little effort.

Unless I'm missing something else here.

You are like glass. Seriously mang.

You still fail to provide arguments to support your opinion and counter my arguments.

I just laugh at you once more.

Isn't that what they teach all lawyers? To call themselves right and others wrong regardless of the facts? Thats all I've seen so far anyway.

Are we allowed to flame in gameplay now? If we are, that's cool. Just let me know.

When you make a suggestion based on your logic and people provide you logical arguments that (seem to) prove you wrong, you have two options.

Either accept it and say you were wrong, or make counter arguments using logic and prove yourself right.

You have failed to do either of these two things.

Actually, what we have here is a differing point of view. You think it's not too powerful to have decked out NPCs, and that tribunal NPCs were designed with the understanding that they could all be decked in enchanted gear. That's cool. I think that it is overpowered, and that NPCs were not designed for such use. We obviously can't both be right, because our points of view are exclusive of each other.

What you don't understand is that you will fail to convince me on an issue based on point of view. I do understand that we will fail to convince each other on an issue that is based on point of view, so it's not worth my time to try. We've both laid out our points of view (most of which, as I have repeatedly said, was said in the first couple of pages) quite well. All that remains is for the imms to say what their decision is.

That is why I don't sit here and say "wah, no, you're wrong". I wish you understood that intuitively instead of my having to tell you. You're spending too much time and effort trying to argue with me instead of just putting forward your argument and letting the imms decide what they'll do.