Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sat Nov 30, 2024 7:01 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 6:07 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 9:51 am
Posts: 317
Location: US
Gremlin24 wrote:
Both of these are stellar ideas. My only suggestion would be to either have the midnight rule, or to change it to 20 hours instead of 24. Either way, it is annoying as hell to have to be on at the exact time to reward people, and sometimes it means people who play at certain hours get rewarded less.


I'm with Gremlin it is a real pain to wait until 10:00 at night to have a reward again. I usually wait until later in the day to reward so I don't waste it. ( Granted some may abuse this )


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:57 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Mar 28, 2002 5:08 pm
Posts: 433
Location: MIddle of NOwhere Town
SK Character: Amberdin, Ashiya, Zinnya
Quote:
I'd wait a few more months before deciding that we need quotas. Keep in mind that previous sets were much more favorable to the dark, until all the dark side PARs except Naixin deleted.


You come back to my point. This isn't about the Light dominating the flags. This is about either aura being in that position.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 10, 2007 1:36 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 10:40 pm
Posts: 271
I do understand that your concern is aura neutral. However, my point is that quotas are an unnecessary complication. Ever since the change, there have been times when the PAR set leans towards one side or other, and yet well-RPed characters on the other side have always shown up eventually to rebalance the roster. Now these people attained the flag despite being on the 'under-represented' side, which implies that they did get a chance in spite of the PAR distribution. Unrestricted competition seems to be working as it should. So what exactly is the problem that quotas are supposed to solve, which the system doesn't already cover?

That said, what bugs me about that WHO list is that seven paragons are playing at the same hours (nine if you also count Naixin and Gork, since I see them on the morning shift too). If anyone is getting shafted, it's the people who play in under-represented time zones. Unfortunately, I don't think you can code a change to fix this issue.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:48 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 4:55 pm
Posts: 1110
Location: Ithaca, NY
Another minor potential tweak:

Allow PARs to give out EITHER two small enlightenments, or one medium enlightenment. It always felt like I was, in some small way, punishing others by giving out a small reward.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 10:14 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:27 am
Posts: 5014
Location: Hiding
in what way would enlightening someone be punishing them :P


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 3:02 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 5:26 am
Posts: 633
Location: Powder Springs, GA
Giving small reward punishes the next person you want to give a medium reward because of the 'same time next day' paragon system. You may just ignore the small reward candidate and keep on waiting for that medium.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 56 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group