Shattered Kingdoms

Where Roleplay and Tactics Collide
VOTE NOW!
It is currently Sat Oct 11, 2025 2:11 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 8:52 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 1:03 pm
Posts: 1593
Location: pyrathia
I think we should keep it simple... Changing one adept spell to a skill would be nice (pressure point as stated) and since it is the same effect it is not likely to be overpowered... Should be easy to code as well...

The only problem is that if the adepts get tanks they could be overpowered as a cabal...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:05 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:55 am
Posts: 205
So here's how I think I see this working
Skill Mangle
Syntax Mangle left/right arm/leg target
Powered by an Adepts bloodlust the Mangle Skill allows you to target and attack the (bleeding?) limb of your enemy with such force that it renders that limb completely useless.

The skill has to have a condition or else it would just be sunder right arm enemy and that is a bit overpowered I'm not sure of the varying degrees of damage a limb goes through but I think maybe this skill could be a tide turner instead of a I win button. I do think there should have to be some reagent before this could be used (the blood of the injured limb in this case) and only certain weapons can be used to mangle just like only certain weapons can be used to do that Hammer thing that they do.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 11:48 am 
Ew. No. Stop suggesting changes to a spell that doesn't need changing.

What needs happening is a new dark-aura cabal similar to the Hammer of Light that makes its home in the deep and/or Uxmal.


Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 12:14 pm 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 1:55 pm
Posts: 1330
Location: I am at one with my duality.
I wasn't here for the starting of the cabals/tribunals, but what I have been told about the starting makes me think that it was actually players who decided to run with an idea to form a group. Even if I am wrong, though, I would think a long standing, non-coded player group would be more go further to convince D and the rest of the IMMs that there should be another cabal/tribunal rather than simply pulling one out of thin air.

So, basically, why doesn't anyone just try to start a cabal/tribunal ICly and work from there? Maybe another cabal could branch off from an existing one?


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 19, 2007 5:42 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 5:05 pm
Posts: 2620
Location: *cough*
wow, um...

that is actually a really good idea.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 9:12 am 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 9:55 am
Posts: 205
The Mighty Fluffball wrote:
wow, um...

that is actually a really good idea.



Sometimes it's ok to Quote....


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:24 pm 
Offline
Mortal

Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 1:03 pm
Posts: 1593
Location: pyrathia
Would be nice but then wertsnuts got cursed, the mangos were insulted, and pretty much any playergourp is disbanded after a month or so, and even the ones that are not are dead within one generation of characters...


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 21, 2007 2:39 pm 
Offline
Mortal Philanthropist

Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 1:55 pm
Posts: 1330
Location: I am at one with my duality.
:-?

I'm going to assume you are joking if you think those player groups had legitimate chances at becoming cabals or tribunals. Aside from the brood, I don't know if I have seen anyone attempt to make a non-family, cabal-type player group in a while. As well, I suggested breaking into a sub-section of a cabal. While those groups might have done something like that, it really wasn't the type of thing I was talking about.

An idea might be to join the MC and try to break the midnight-cabal portion off of the legions of the east. As much as I have been against the idea, you would then have two groups and have your dark crusading group. As well, a certain leader could possibly break a piece of the Adepts off to make his own blood army or crusaders of darkness. Then that cabal could be split in two to make one group that acts more like a church (anti-fist) and the other that acts more like anti-hammer.

This is just a rough outline of a suggestion, and by no means is it limited to just this. My suggestion is meant to get people to think creatively and in game rather than continue to gripe on the boards about how what they think they need.

Aaaaand, I think Dulrik might be more keen on the idea of starting a new group if he sees there are the numbers to support it. Many people, including me to some degree, wish there were a few less options, not more, and I think that is one of the primary reasons there hasn't been a new group aside from all of the work.


Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group