When I played before, PAR was based on class, I think it was a great idea to strip it from classes and make it a more open title. However there is something I have noticed recently, and I am wondering if anyone else has.
Disclaimer: I am not saying ANYTHING against those listed below. These are simply the people that are online today when I checked.
Who list wrote:
[PAR ---] Wortsenawl, Knight of Truth
[PAR ---] Aelraen Softstone, Hero of the Free, Chieftain of all Ayamao.
[PAR ---] Sithara Theos - Storm's Voice - Lorekeeper
[PAR ---] Eusd Knight of Dawn, Captain of the Peacekeepers
[PAR ---] Filliokwe Defender of the Verdant Arcane
[PAR ---] Linarumien Erevan, Savant of History, High Priestess of Wisdom
[PAR Pri] Lirimaer Elda, Devoted Dove of the Rose, Ayamaoan Advisor
Now correct me if I am wrong, but all the above are either lighties or grey aura people who lean towards the light side. I could be wrong, but it seems to me that almost all of the current paragons are like that. I don't get full round the clock playtime, but I can't think of any evil character that is PAR. Do we have any?
That being said, I am not accusing PARs of not cross-aura rewarding. A PAR does not get nearly the same RP opportunities cross aura, as they do within their aura. That's nothing against either side, but how often can dark aura characters interact with light aura characters? Sure it can happen, but not as often. Again, these are just my observations, and they might have no truth to them.
How would people feel about limiting the number of PARs per aura? Or have a requirement for at least 3 PARs per aura every month? This would assure some separation within the aura sphere of the game, and hopefully more opportunity to be rewarded.