Historic Druid Timeline

Sypher · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:02 am

2004: The first and only paladin to my knowledge manages to work his way into the druids. (Sorrinius HF of the Scale) O_O

*pops ego* :roll:

Dark-Avenger · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 3:48 am

We had one more a few months ago, but thank god he was not active.

Paladins have no place in the druids, period.

Guest · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:14 am

I often wonder why small minds create huge limitations.

Mot · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:16 am

own! wrote:

I often wonder why small minds create huge limitations.

Because empty space is terrifying and they've got a lot of it to ignore.

Ariela · **Joined:** Thu Sep 22, 2005 5:35 am **Posts:** 104

Or, to fill with useless crap.

Mot · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 6:30 am

That works too.

juggernaut · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:54 am

Yes, I can see you guys putting the theory in practise. Can an imm please delete these posts from THIS thread?

Guest · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:05 am

I've always understood it as the Druids needing to maintain balance. So if there are paladins being inducted into the druids then they should by default allow necromancers into the cabal. And a lot of the tenets of being a paladin such as a vow of chastity is rather anti-Druid as well. I could go on and on but I'll just use the real life scenario of putting a Jew intoa group of Palestinians. It just doesn't work so well.

juggernaut · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:46 am

I agree with Ardith and D-A on this one. A paladin, a zealot of the light is one of the extremes, just as is a diabolical necromancer. They have no place in the Druids imo.

Lagelli · **Posted:** Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:51 am

Ardith wrote:

I've always understood it as the Druids needing to maintain balance. So if there are paladins being inducted into the druids then they should by default allow necromancers into the cabal.

Not necromancers, Hellions.

Shattered Kingdoms

Historic Druid Timeline

Who is online