ladyjennbo wrote:
I don't think most of us are fit to lick Sargas' boots. He offers so, so much to the game.
Except, as ardith once mentioned in the comments at another site, it's pretty funny that the NPC he based off his swashbuckler sucked so hard.
And he still sucks, he just now sucks forever.
Galactus wrote:
Actually, IMM favortism and abuse led to many of the incidents of this char. They are perfectly valid.
[edit]
I should add not saying you have shown IMM favortism. Afaik, it was mainly just Sargas.
I always chuckle at the claim of "IMM favoritism" because the vast majority of difficult players I had to deal with who I caught doing something, at one point or another, gotten cursed by me, including actual good friends of mine -- which makes the entire claim laughable, but here we are! Some of those characters got deleted. Life goes on.
I liked Reinald the character and have no actual issue with the player even though I think he was really, really bad at playing his alignment. I would've honestly preferred him to be some sort of gray aura, because then everything he ever did would've made much, much more sense to me. I'm pretty happy to see that Reinald was played through for so long and I'm actually fairly impressed that a first character was so long-lasting and thoroughly executed. Props.
Quote:
[...]What happens when different imms have different views on rules? Especially rules that aren't in any helpfile or even go against some of them? What happens when imms contradict each other? I don't think that Dulrik has nearly enough time to settle all the disputes arising from these conflicts, and gathering scattered Dulrik quotes from the times he did settle some dispute is almost futile. I think both the playerbase and the immortals could benefit if a collection of all those clarifications to the rules could be gathered.
Yes please. This is one of the things I'd like to see most in the game: clean clarification of rules, what's acceptable and what isn't, and clear outlining of the punishment you can expect for things. It's really hard to claim favoritism when the end result of breaking a rule is the same across the board.