Oh yeah, hoarding places and even more hoarding places.
Great, great...
Short answer: I hate it.
| Shattered Kingdoms https://shatteredkingdoms.com/forums/ |
|
| Lucius has a spell idea to substitute for FS https://shatteredkingdoms.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=22&t=13202 |
Page 1 of 6 |
| Author: | Lucius [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Lucius has a spell idea to substitute for FS |
What if we got rid of the unusable/restricted/hated Final strike spell, and gave Sorcs a lower level knock/wizlock spell that would be pickable and bashable, and one GM "Greater Wizlock" that would make a door unpickable, unbashable, and unpassable with Ether? This would also help create a mage tower feel for high level Sorcs too. What are your (non flame) thoughts? |
|
| Author: | Dark-Avenger [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Oh yeah, hoarding places and even more hoarding places. Great, great...
Short answer: I hate it. |
|
| Author: | Tatali0n [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 4:54 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
The idea of a sorceror who is able to charm a victim, lead them to a warded room and then lock them in with no chance of escape or rescue is ropey. I'm not sure any player should have such easy access to the unqualified restraint of another. |
|
| Author: | Lucius [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Dark-Avenger wrote: Oh yeah, hoarding places and even more hoarding places.
Great, great... Short answer: I hate it. not with a spell time restriction. Is that the only reason you hate it? |
|
| Author: | Lucius [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Tatali0n wrote: The idea of a sorceror who is able to charm a victim, lead them to a warded room and then lock them in with no chance of escape or rescue is ropey. I'm not sure any player should have such easy access to the unqualified restraint of another.
Well, holding someone on charm is not a very fun without RP, nor is it an easy thing to do (i.e. OOC resisting, cabals and friends coming to aid). If there is limits to the duration of the door, you could have all of your cabal members waiting outside. Again, a limited spell duration would change your reason for dislike no? |
|
| Author: | Dark-Avenger [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
OK, it's not only a place for the sorc to hoard lewt, but to even hide himself. If someone is in a locked area and none can go in, he can sit there risk free and even when the timer ends, he recasts the spell. Look, a sorc that can't be killed. Only with voodoo this can happen, but anyone can logout when a potential voodoo threat is around. I know it, I've witnessed it with my shaman. PS: I understand CRS is working almost like that but even then there is a way in to kill the sorc. |
|
| Author: | Lakir [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 5:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
If a sorc wants to be invincible they already have that ability... Neat idea, although I don't see it happening. |
|
| Author: | Fepel Veiled [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 6:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Five words. I really don't like it. If you want a safe area, go play in one, there are quite a few available. Besides, no one in their right mind would choose wizlock over imbue. 
|
|
| Author: | Lei_Kung [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 7:23 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I wouldn't mind seeing a replacement spell for FS, but not this. Ultimately, this spell only encourages the negative side of sorcs and solo playing. It is interesting but at best doesn't help the game's playability and at worst hurts the game's playability. Lei Kung |
|
| Author: | Ilyana [ Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
This goes way over the top. There are plenty of places a person can go to hide without other places being made unaccessible. What if a sorceror did it to an inn or a newbie school? There could be a -lot- of problems with something like this. I'm all for the replacement of FS, but not with a spell like this. |
|
| Page 1 of 6 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|