Drewbag wrote:
jhorleb wrote:
I believe the base damage for the two will be the same. The difference is that the two hander will allow you to take better advantage of your strength bonus.
I'm still very fuzzy on what that means exactly... Better use of strength meaning?
I'll use D&D numbers to give you an idea:
Let's say your character has 18 strength, granting you a +4 strength modifier.
You pick up a longsword, a one-handed weapon dealing 1d8 damage for a medium sized weapon. Your strikes deal 1d8+4 damage.
If you upgraded to a two-handed glaive, the weapon's base damage is 1d10, you get Reach, and you ALSO apply one-and-a-half your strength bonus because you wield the weapon in both hands. Your strikes deal 1d10
+6 damage.
Get it? Strength modifiers count for more with two-handed weapons. Again, the D&D numbers totally are probably not the SK numbers, but the example should suffice: give up holding a shield and you are compensated by being more offensively viable. In SK, the two-handed strength bonus could be for attack rolls, for example, instead of damage.
The choice between one or two-handed versions of a weapon, I think, is best contemplated as you would going mood aggressive or defensive.